Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Alabama

Hanna Tuscaloosa

Tuscaloosa, AL · ~217 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hanna Tuscaloosa runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade D.

Hanna Tuscaloosa: 6.4 TCR = 193% of Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hanna Tuscaloosa safety composite

Hanna Tuscaloosa scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hanna Tuscaloosa: 2.9 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 11.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2024

Hanna Tuscaloosa's TCR rose 3.1 from 2.9 in 2016 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Tuscaloosa, AL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 193% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #14/19
  • PHOTO Machining and Weldin…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 71 inj
  • SIZE ~217 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Hanna Tuscaloosa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hanna Tuscaloosa averages 6.4 TCR (193% of the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hanna Tuscaloosa TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2019=11.8 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=6 · 2024=6 · BLS 3.3

Where Hanna Tuscaloosa falls in its industry

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 19 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Alabama.

Hanna Tuscaloosa (217 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hanna Tuscaloosa
Hanna Tuscaloosa (217 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Hanna Tuscaloosa has more employees than the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 4.3 17 0 0
2023 6.0 5.2 15 0 0
2022 5.2 4.8 12 0 0
2019 11.8 5.9 22 0 0
2016 2.9 2.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · AL · Tuscaloosa

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 151 employers in Tuscaloosa, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ameron Pole Products Welding & Fabrication 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bull Moose Tube 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tejas Tubular Products- Stephenville 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Winston Homebuilder Lynn 217 FTE
STATE-SIZE Energy Services South 217 FTE
STATE-SIZE Premier Service Co 217 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gaston Fossil Plant 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phifer Kauloosa 1,419 FTE
CITY-NEAR BFG3 Tuscaloosa Facility 1,340 FTE
CITY-NEAR McAbee Construction Inc 680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tuscaloosa Processing 526 FTE
NAT-TCR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Supermercado La Chiquita No.4 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Willow Brook at Delaware Run 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Waters of Clifty Falls 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Yuma 217 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haynes Electric 217 FTE
NAT-SIZE GROUP Contractors 217 FTE
NAT-SIZE TCCo-DEN 217 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.