Boiler tubes, wrought, made from purchased iron · Minnesota

Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc.

Cokato, MN · ~25 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc. runs at 194% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boiler tubes, wrought, made from purchased iron workplace, earning a grade D.

Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc.: 6.4 TCR = 194% of Boiler tubes, wrought, made from purchased iron BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc. safety composite

Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.6

2017→2023

Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc. injury rate improved

Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc.'s TCR fell 15.6 from 15.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.6 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=9.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Cokato, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 194% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO Ameron Pole Products…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ameron Pole Products Welding & Fabrication (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc. averages 6.4 TCR (194% of the Boiler tubes, wrought, made from purchased iron BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc. TCR series: 2017=15.6 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=9.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc. falls in its industry

329 Boiler tubes, wrought, made fr establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Boiler tubes, wrought, made fr employers in Minnesota.

Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc. (25 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc.
Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc. (25 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc. has fewer employees than the Boiler tubes, wrought, made from purchas median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.2 0.0 2 0 0
2018 8.9 0.0 2 0 0
2017 15.6 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · MN · Cokato

329 Boiler tubes, wrought, made from purchased iron employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 14 employers in Cokato, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ameron Pole Products Welding & Fabrication 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanna Tuscaloosa 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bull Moose Tube 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Spiralweld Pipe Co., LLC 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE GDM Seeds, Inc - Hutchinson, MN 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Park Rapids Trucking 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Country Pork LLP 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MN IPH 03-0110-10, 50, 51, 52, 970 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cokato Charitable Trust 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Process Tech inc 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cokato 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dassel-Cokato ISD #466 92 FTE
NAT-TCR Anderson County Government 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wisconsin Precision Casting 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Save Eleele 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Impact Industries, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brenmar 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Petra Chemical Company 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCK Huntsville 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.