Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) · Minnesota

Hanson Silo Company

Lake Lillian, MN · ~71 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hanson Silo Company runs at 602% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) workplace, earning a grade F.

Hanson Silo Company: 17.5 TCR = 602% of Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hanson Silo Company safety composite

Hanson Silo Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hanson Silo Company: 4.3 → 12.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 36.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.21× in 2024

Hanson Silo Company's TCR rose 8.6 from 4.3 in 2017 to 12.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 36.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Lake Lillian, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.5 · 602% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #126/130
  • PHOTO E.J. Perry Construct…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 82 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: E.J. Perry Construction Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Hanson Silo Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hanson Silo Company averages 17.5 TCR (602% of the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hanson Silo Company TCR series: 2017=4.3 · 2018=23.6 · 2019=19.1 · 2020=36.3 · 2021=20.5 · 2022=8.9 · 2023=14.3 · 2024=12.8 · BLS 2.9

Where Hanson Silo Company falls in its industry

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #126 safest of 130 Warehouse construction (e.g., employers in Minnesota.

Hanson Silo Company (71 employees, TCR 17.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hanson Silo Company
Hanson Silo Company (71 employees, TCR 17.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Hanson Silo Company has more employees than the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.8 3.7 6 1 0
2023 14.3 12.5 8 0 0
2022 8.9 8.9 6 0 0
2021 20.5 12.6 11 2 0
2020 36.3 8.3 15 7 0
2019 19.1 8.9 15 0 0
2018 23.6 13.1 18 0 0
2017 4.3 4.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MN · Lake Lillian

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR E.J. Perry Construction Co., Inc. 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hewn Elements LLC 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DCC Companies Inc 17.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northcentral Construction 17.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fagen, Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rochester Office 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donlar Construction Company 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enebak Construction Company 71 FTE
NAT-TCR Lyman-Morse Camden 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Glasgow State Nursing Facility 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1523 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bracey's Supermarket Inc. 17.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wallace Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tecta America Colorado LLC 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Altorfer Industries, Inc. - East Dundee, IL - 1030 East Main Street 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gundersen - Sparta Clinic 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.