Freight transportation, inland waters (except on Great Lakes system) · Pennsylvania

Harbor Vessel Operations

Name: Harbor Vessel Operations Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Houston, PA · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 2.2
Avg TCR: 4.5
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harbor Vessel Operations runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Freight transportation, inland waters (except on Great Lakes system) workplace, earning a grade A.

Harbor Vessel Operations: 2.2 TCR = 49% of Freight transportation, inland waters (except on Great Lakes system) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harbor Vessel Operations safety composite

Harbor Vessel Operations scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 2.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers
DART rate: D 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2018

Harbor Vessel Operations injury rate improved

Harbor Vessel Operations's TCR fell 1.4 from 2.9 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2018=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 483211 · Houston, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.2 · 49% of ind

DART 1.5 DART
RANK #5/7
PHOTO Marine Operations
BOOK 2y book
INJ 3 inj
SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Marine Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Towing

2.4
ACBL - Western

2.3
This site

2.2
Marine Operati

2.2
Kirby Inland M

2.2

What this shows Harbor Vessel Operations averages 2.2 TCR (49% of the Freight transportation, inland waters (except on Great Lakes system) BLS benchmark).

Harbor Vessel Operations TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2018=1.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Harbor Vessel Operations falls in its industry

48 Freight transportation, inland establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Freight transportation, inland employers in Pennsylvania.

Harbor Vessel Operations (50 employees, TCR 2.2) among 28 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Harbor Vessel Operations has fewer employees than the Freight transportation, inland waters (e median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	1.5	1.5	1	0	0
2016	2.9	2.9	2	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

483211 · PA · Houston

48 Freight transportation, inland waters (except on Great Lakes system) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 15 employers in Houston, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Marine Operations	CATLETTSBURG, KY	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Kirby Inland Marine	HOUSTON, TX	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	ACBL - Western Coal Terminal	ST. LOUIS, MO	2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Towing	CRANFORD, NJ	2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE	To-Jo Food Products Inc.	AVONDALE	50 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Kulp Family Dairy LLC	MARTINSBURG	50 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Maronda Homes Inc of Pennsylvania	IMPERIAL	50 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Home Remodeling Pros of Central PA	MECHANICSBURG	50 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Campbell Transportation Company (Vessel Operations)	Houston	454 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Houston Distribution Center	Houston	355 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Houston Distribution Center - ABARTA Coca-Cola Beverages	Houston	351 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Pennsylvainia Office	Houston	292 FTE
NAT-TCR	0106 - Chattanooga, Tn	Chattanooga, TN	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	N and R of Mexico LLC	Mexico, MO	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Legends - Charlotte PNC Amphitheate	Charlotte, NC	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	TMCo Inc	Wewoka, OK	2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Muddy Creek	Winston-Salem, NC	50 FTE
NAT-SIZE	AmeriGas - Ft. Lauderdale, FL	Ft Lauderdale, FL	50 FTE
NAT-SIZE	06- Knoxville, TN	Oak Ridge, TN	50 FTE
NAT-SIZE	North Coast Concrete Inc.	Valley View, OH	50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.