Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

HarborChase of Jacksonville

Jacksonville, FL · ~75 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HarborChase of Jacksonville runs at 269% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

HarborChase of Jacksonville: 10.2 TCR = 269% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HarborChase of Jacksonville safety composite

HarborChase of Jacksonville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2018→2019

HarborChase of Jacksonville injury rate improved

HarborChase of Jacksonville's TCR fell 2.1 from 11.3 in 2018 to 9.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.3 · 2019=9.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Jacksonville, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 269% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #287/396
  • PHOTO Atria Bonita
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atria Bonita (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

HarborChase of Jacksonville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HarborChase of Jacksonville averages 10.2 TCR (269% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HarborChase of Jacksonville TCR series: 2018=11.3 · 2019=9.2 · BLS 3.8

Where HarborChase of Jacksonville falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #287 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

HarborChase of Jacksonville (75 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate HarborChase of Jacksonville
HarborChase of Jacksonville (75 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

HarborChase of Jacksonville has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 9.2 3.7 5 0 0
2018 11.3 3.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Jacksonville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atria Bonita 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autumn Green at Wright Campus 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hawthorne House 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Promenade Middletown 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Xtreme Powerline Construction Inc (Florida Division) 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wingate Service Center 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE First Florida Constructors, LLC - Tampa 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE McIntyre Elwell Strammer GC Inc 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR Hawthorne House 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Autumn Green at Wright Campus 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hesselbein Tire Southwest 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bradford Oaks Center 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Solid Waste Management Divison 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Albuquerque - AMG Specialty Hospital 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ione Plant 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE RCD Equipment 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.