Commercial building construction general contractors · Arizona

Hardison/Downey Construction

Phoenix, AZ · ~114 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hardison/Downey Construction runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Hardison/Downey Construction: 2.0 TCR = 68% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hardison/Downey Construction safety composite

Hardison/Downey Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hardison/Downey Construction held a steady TCR band

Hardison/Downey Construction's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.4 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.4 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 68% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #59/106
  • PHOTO Boro Developers, Inc…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boro Developers, Inc. d/b/a Boro Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Hardison/Downey Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hardison/Downey Construction averages 2.0 TCR (68% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hardison/Downey Construction TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2018=2 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=1.5 · BLS 2.9

Where Hardison/Downey Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 106 Commercial building constructi employers in Arizona.

Hardison/Downey Construction (114 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Hardison/Downey Construction
Hardison/Downey Construction (114 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Hardison/Downey Construction has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.5 1.0 3 0 0
2020 2.6 2.1 5 0 0
2019 2.3 0.8 3 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2016 1.4 1.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · AZ · Phoenix

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boro Developers, Inc. d/b/a Boro Construction 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Construction 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wolf Creek Contracting 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JCI Contractors, Inc. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE HubWest 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE VDC AZ 1 Campus 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7102120 FPL Sonoran 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bergelectric Corp. AZ 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-30338) 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bennys Car Wash - Essen 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR McKee Foods Corporation-Sales and Marketing 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mohawk Hospital Equipment 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Foundation Park ACC 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ferro Corporation 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE John C. Stennis Memorial Hospital 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina, 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.