Meal delivery programs · North Carolina

Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina,

Raleigh, NC · ~114 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina, runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Meal delivery programs workplace, earning a grade C.

Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina,: 3.3 TCR = 88% of Meal delivery programs BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina, safety composite

Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina, scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina, held a steady TCR band

Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina,'s TCR held near 0.3 from 3.0 in 2017 to 2.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.0 · 2018=4.9 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624210 · Raleigh, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 88% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Feeding America East…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Feeding America Eastern Wisconsin (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina, in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina, averages 3.3 TCR (88% of the Meal delivery programs BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina, TCR series: 2017=3 · 2018=4.9 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina, falls in its industry

147 Meal delivery programs establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Meal delivery programs employers in North Carolina.

Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina, (114 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina,
Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina, (114 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina, has more employees than the Meal delivery programs median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.7 0.0 2 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 3 0 0
2018 4.9 2.9 5 0 0
2017 3.0 2.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624210 · NC · Raleigh

147 Meal delivery programs employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Feeding America Eastern Wisconsin 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meals on Wheels Central Texas Main Office 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farm Share Inc 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metropolitan Ministries Inc - Tampa 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod USA, LLC 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cliffside Steam Station 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pike Telecom and Renewables Pennsylvania Statewide Operations 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turner Asphalt LLC 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Abraham Lincoln Memorial Hospital 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant SR 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Paso Robles CA 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE John C. Stennis Memorial Hospital 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Gardens at Wyoming Valley 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foundation Park ACC 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hardison/Downey Construction 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.