Checkbooks and refills printing · North Carolina

Harland Clarke High Point

High Point, NC · ~267 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harland Clarke High Point runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Checkbooks and refills printing workplace, earning a grade C.

Harland Clarke High Point: 3.1 TCR = 93% of Checkbooks and refills printing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harland Clarke High Point safety composite

Harland Clarke High Point scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2024

Harland Clarke High Point injury rate improved

Harland Clarke High Point's TCR fell 2.9 from 4.6 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · High Point, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 93% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #60/92
  • PHOTO Kay Toledo Tag
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~267 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kay Toledo Tag (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Harland Clarke High Point in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harland Clarke High Point averages 3.1 TCR (93% of the Checkbooks and refills printing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harland Clarke High Point TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=3 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Harland Clarke High Point falls in its industry

2,001 Checkbooks and refills printin establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 92 Checkbooks and refills printin employers in North Carolina.

Harland Clarke High Point (267 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Harland Clarke High Point
Harland Clarke High Point (267 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Harland Clarke High Point has more employees than the Checkbooks and refills printing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 4 0 0
2023 2.4 1.9 5 0 0
2022 3.9 2.9 8 0 0
2021 3.0 1.3 7 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 6 0 0
2019 2.2 1.1 6 0 0
2018 4.2 3.2 12 0 0
2016 4.6 2.6 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · NC · High Point

2,001 Checkbooks and refills printing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 243 employers in High Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kay Toledo Tag 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR HC Acqusition dba Heinn Chapman 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TMI ACQUISITION LLC 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR C2 Imaging - Englewood 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alamance Foods - Worth Street Plant 267 FTE
STATE-SIZE KBI Biopharma - Patriot Park 267 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant # 9 267 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zero Waste Recycling 267 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - High Point Medical Center 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF HIGH POINT 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point Medical Center 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR Location 26 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CTS Construction 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ritter Communications - Millington 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Enzyme Development Corporation 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lisle Corporation 267 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mcs of Tampa Inc 267 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA PA Fredericksburg DSC 267 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwest Shipyard Channelview 267 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.