Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Florida

Harper Limbach - Tampa

Tampa, FL · ~151 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harper Limbach - Tampa runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Harper Limbach - Tampa: 2.4 TCR = 85% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harper Limbach - Tampa safety composite

Harper Limbach - Tampa scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2018→2021

Harper Limbach - Tampa injury rate improved

Harper Limbach - Tampa's TCR fell 0.7 from 0.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.7 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Tampa, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #136/425
  • PHOTO Mechanical Design Sy…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~151 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mechanical Design Systems, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Harper Limbach - Tampa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harper Limbach - Tampa averages 2.4 TCR (85% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harper Limbach - Tampa TCR series: 2018=0.7 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Harper Limbach - Tampa falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #136 safest of 425 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Florida.

Harper Limbach - Tampa (151 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Harper Limbach - Tampa
Harper Limbach - Tampa (151 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Harper Limbach - Tampa has more employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.7 5.9 8 9 0
2019 1.1 0.6 2 0 0
2018 0.7 0.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · FL · Tampa

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mechanical Design Systems, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR On Point HVAC Corp 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walker J Walker 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Fire Protection Systems, LLC 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clearwater Operations Complex 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jax Utilities Management, Inc. 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Infinite Communications, Inc. 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA FL Tampa 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Blue Ridge Healthcare Brookview House 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Baltimore Manufacturing 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Air Reps LLC - Bellevue Office 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MANN+HUMMEL Plant 3 Dunlap,TN 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE IES Communications, LLC - Strategic Accounts 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE University of Connecticut - Waterbury Branch 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nelson Tree Service, LLC 464 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE STC 151 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.