Bindery machinery manufacturing · California

Harris & Bruno Machine Co. Inc. Roseville

Roseville, CA · ~104 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harris & Bruno Machine Co. Inc. Roseville runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bindery machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Harris & Bruno Machine Co. Inc. Roseville: 3.4 TCR = 104% of Bindery machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harris & Bruno Machine Co. Inc. Roseville safety composite

Harris & Bruno Machine Co. Inc. Roseville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2017→2023

Harris & Bruno Machine Co. Inc. Roseville injury rate improved

Harris & Bruno Machine Co. Inc. Roseville's TCR fell 2.1 from 5.8 in 2017 to 3.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.8 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333244 · Roseville, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 104% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #4/9
  • PHOTO Ackley
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ackley (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Harris & Bruno Machine Co. Inc. Roseville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harris & Bruno Machine Co. Inc. Roseville averages 3.4 TCR (104% of the Bindery machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harris & Bruno Machine Co. Inc. Roseville TCR series: 2017=5.8 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=4 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Harris & Bruno Machine Co. Inc. Roseville falls in its industry

82 Bindery machinery manufacturin establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 9 Bindery machinery manufacturin employers in California.

Harris & Bruno Machine Co. Inc. Roseville (104 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Harris & Bruno Machine Co. Inc. Roseville
Harris & Bruno Machine Co. Inc. Roseville (104 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Harris & Bruno Machine Co. Inc. Roseville has more employees than the Bindery machinery manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.7 2.5 3 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 1 1 0
2021 1.2 0.0 0 1 0
2020 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2019 4.0 4.0 4 0 0
2018 4.1 3.1 4 0 0
2017 5.8 2.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333244 · CA · Roseville

82 Bindery machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ackley 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maxson Automatic Machinery Company 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITW Trans Tech 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE farm management inc 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kendall Farms LP 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maple Dairy L.P 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Veg-Land, Inc. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121801 4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621801 3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR General Restoration Corporation 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Municipio de Las Marias - Alcaldia 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Morais Concrete Service Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR LindenGrove Communities - Mukwonago Ridge 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sound Inc. 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martins Food Markets # 6012 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100829 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100030 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.