Nuclear Electric Power Generation · North Carolina

Harris Nuclear Plant

New Hill, NC · ~693 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harris Nuclear Plant runs at 8% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nuclear Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade A.

Harris Nuclear Plant: 0.1 TCR = 8% of Nuclear Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harris Nuclear Plant safety composite

Harris Nuclear Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2024

Harris Nuclear Plant injury rate improved

Harris Nuclear Plant's TCR fell 0.5 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · New Hill, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 8% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P78
  • PHOTO Nine Mile Point (NMP…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~693 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nine Mile Point (NMP) Nuclear Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Harris Nuclear Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harris Nuclear Plant averages 0.1 TCR (8% of the Nuclear Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harris Nuclear Plant TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Harris Nuclear Plant falls in its industry

80 Nuclear Electric Power Generat establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Harris Nuclear Plant (693 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate Harris Nuclear Plant
Harris Nuclear Plant (693 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Harris Nuclear Plant has more employees than the Nuclear Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.1 0.0 0 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.5 0.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · NC · New Hill

80 Nuclear Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 6 employers in New Hill, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nine Mile Point (NMP) Nuclear Station 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palo Verde Generating Station 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation. 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Station 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6921-06000 688 FTE
STATE-SIZE DLP Central Carolina Medical Center d/b/a Central Carolina Hospital 688 FTE
STATE-SIZE County of Surry 698 FTE
STATE-SIZE 253 AUT - GREENSBORO 699 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harris Energy and Environmental Center 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harris Energy & Environmental Center 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peak Truss Builders LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harris Technical Training Facility Center 28 FTE
NAT-TCR Brand Scaffold Services Inc. - Chevron Refinery - El Segundo 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR BrandSafway LLC - Dow Chemicals - Seadrift 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Transportation America, Inc. 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Barceloneta 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Capsugel 693 FTE
NAT-SIZE 300000170856815 - AZ-Phoenix-Operating Center 693 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodrich Corporation (Troy OH) 693 FTE
NAT-SIZE INNSBROOK 693 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.