Electric power generation, nuclear · Kansas

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation.

Burlington, KS · ~1,225 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation. runs at 8% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, nuclear workplace, earning a grade A.

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation.: 0.1 TCR = 8% of Electric power generation, nuclear BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation. safety composite

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation. held a steady TCR band

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 0.1 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.1 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Burlington, KS AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 8% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P78
  • PHOTO Nine Mile Point (NMP…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~1,225 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nine Mile Point (NMP) Nuclear Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation. averages 0.1 TCR (8% of the Electric power generation, nuclear BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation. TCR series: 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation. falls in its industry

80 Electric power generation, nuc establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation. (1,225 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation.
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation. (1,225 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation. has more employees than the Electric power generation, nuclear median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.2 0.1 2 0 0
2018 0.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · KS · Burlington

80 Electric power generation, nuclear employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 10 employers in Burlington, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nine Mile Point (NMP) Nuclear Station 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palo Verde Generating Station 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harris Nuclear Plant 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Station 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 3803 - Topeka KS DC 1,228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Learjet Inc. - Wichita, Kansas 1,219 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frontier Dairy, LLC 1,240 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goodwill Emporia 1,251 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolf Creek - Evergy 1,085 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolf Creek Generating Station 937 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burlington Medical Investors LLC dba Life Care Center of Burlington 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Life Care Centers of Burlington 73 FTE
NAT-TCR St. Louis Community Office 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shell Polymers Monaca 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Carmelitos 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific (Asheville) LLC - Biltmore Park 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pitt County Government 1,225 FTE
NAT-SIZE AdventHealth Wesley Chapel 1,225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Grapevine 1,225 FTE
NAT-SIZE LMH - Lower Manhattan Hospital 1,225 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.