Distribution of electric power · Pennsylvania

HARSC Harrisburg Service Center

Harrisburg, PA · ~89 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HARSC Harrisburg Service Center runs at 258% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

HARSC Harrisburg Service Center: 3.1 TCR = 258% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HARSC Harrisburg Service Center safety composite

HARSC Harrisburg Service Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

HARSC Harrisburg Service Center held a steady TCR band

HARSC Harrisburg Service Center's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.6 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Harrisburg, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.1 · 258% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #47/58
  • PHOTO Great Falls Service …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Great Falls Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

HARSC Harrisburg Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HARSC Harrisburg Service Center averages 3.1 TCR (258% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HARSC Harrisburg Service Center TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=4 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 1.2

Where HARSC Harrisburg Service Center falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 58 Distribution of electric power employers in Pennsylvania.

HARSC Harrisburg Service Center (89 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate HARSC Harrisburg Service Center
HARSC Harrisburg Service Center (89 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

HARSC Harrisburg Service Center has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.7 0.0 2 0 0
2022 4.8 3.6 4 0 0
2021 2.3 0.0 2 0 0
2020 6.3 5.3 6 0 0
2019 4.0 2.0 4 0 0
2018 1.8 0.0 2 0 0
2016 1.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · PA · Harrisburg

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 362 employers in Harrisburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Great Falls Service Center 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edinburg Location 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Birmingham Division Trussville 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 33 HSC 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE RS Mowery Sons 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE SDC (Hummel) 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Refrigeration Design & Service 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Limbach - EPA 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle Hospitals 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHS/HARRISBURG HOSPITAL 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pinnacle Health Medical Services 2,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle 2,311 FTE
NAT-TCR Great Falls Service Center 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Distribution - Logan NJ 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. (Missouri) 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dalton-Howell, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Barnes Aerospace East Granby Division 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Ohio Desk Company 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE URE 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Total Electric Contracting, LLC 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.