Aircraft propellers and parts manufacturing · Ohio

Hartzell Propeller Composite

Piqua, OH · ~37 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hartzell Propeller Composite runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft propellers and parts manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Hartzell Propeller Composite: 3.5 TCR = 106% of Aircraft propellers and parts manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hartzell Propeller Composite safety composite

Hartzell Propeller Composite scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hartzell Propeller Composite held a steady TCR band

Hartzell Propeller Composite's TCR held near 0.2 from 3.6 in 2017 to 3.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Piqua, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 106% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #35/37
  • PHOTO United Rotorcraft - TX
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: United Rotorcraft - TX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Hartzell Propeller Composite in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hartzell Propeller Composite averages 3.5 TCR (106% of the Aircraft propellers and parts manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hartzell Propeller Composite TCR series: 2017=3.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=3.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Hartzell Propeller Composite falls in its industry

650 Aircraft propellers and parts establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 37 Aircraft propellers and parts employers in Ohio.

Hartzell Propeller Composite (37 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Hartzell Propeller Composite
Hartzell Propeller Composite (37 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Hartzell Propeller Composite has fewer employees than the Aircraft propellers and parts manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.8 1.3 2 1 0
2022 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2021 5.5 2.7 1 1 0
2020 6.8 6.8 0 2 0
2019 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.6 3.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · OH · Piqua

650 Aircraft propellers and parts manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 65 employers in Piqua, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR United Rotorcraft - TX 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodrich Landing System Everett WA 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plascore, Inc. - Machine Core 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ferra Aerospace 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Biosecurity Building 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus SW Svc Ctr 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lead Building Company LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unified Restoration Systems, LLC 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evenflo Company 298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crane Pumps and Systems 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crane Pumps & Systems Piqua 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3765 267 FTE
NAT-TCR Spoonflower Durham Facility 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Brandon Wood Retirement Center 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Benz Oil LLC 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ndx H&O Dental Laboratory 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Morgan Advanced Materials 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0d28 - W Pittsburgh Pa Fas 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aloft Bolingbrook 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE LMI - Lenexa 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.