Final Assembly process for Boeing Landing Gear - 777, 767,747,& 737 · Washington

Goodrich Landing System Everett WA

Everett, WA · ~52 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Goodrich Landing System Everett WA runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Final Assembly process for Boeing Landing Gear - 777, 767,747,& 737 workplace, earning a grade C.

Goodrich Landing System Everett WA: 3.5 TCR = 106% of Final Assembly process for Boeing Landing Gear - 777, 767,747,& 737 BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Goodrich Landing System Everett WA safety composite

Goodrich Landing System Everett WA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Goodrich Landing System Everett WA: 2.3 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.34× in 2018

Goodrich Landing System Everett WA's TCR rose 2.4 from 2.3 in 2017 to 4.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Everett, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 106% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #33/47
  • PHOTO Hartzell Propeller …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hartzell Propeller Composite (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Goodrich Landing System Everett WA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Goodrich Landing System Everett WA averages 3.5 TCR (106% of the Final Assembly process for Boeing Landing Gear - 777, 767,747,& 737 BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Goodrich Landing System Everett WA TCR series: 2017=2.3 · 2018=4.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Goodrich Landing System Everett WA falls in its industry

650 Final Assembly process for Boe establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 47 Final Assembly process for Boe employers in Washington.

Goodrich Landing System Everett WA (52 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Goodrich Landing System Everett WA
Goodrich Landing System Everett WA (52 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Goodrich Landing System Everett WA has fewer employees than the Final Assembly process for Boeing Landin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2017 2.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · WA · Everett

650 Final Assembly process for Boeing Landing Gear - 777, 767,747,& 737 employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 271 employers in Everett, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hartzell Propeller Composite 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Rotorcraft - TX 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plascore, Inc. - Machine Core 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ferra Aerospace 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Naches Heights 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willamette Egg Farms Moses Lake 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Troutlodge 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE FV Frontier Spirit 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA004 31,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA660 EVERETT MEDICAL CTR COLBY-EVERETT HR 3,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snohomish County Government 3,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snohomish County 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR LiDestri Lee Rd. South 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Senior Health-First Coast, LLC 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Penske : 4729-00 Cardinal/Houston, TX 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Circle Transportation Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE X-Press It Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE USF Tampa FL 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courier Express Charlotte, NC 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holland - GY 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.