Building cleaning services, janitorial · Texas

Harvard Maintenance Inc of Texas

Houston, TX · ~317 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harvard Maintenance Inc of Texas runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade A.

Harvard Maintenance Inc of Texas: 2.0 TCR = 44% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harvard Maintenance Inc of Texas safety composite

Harvard Maintenance Inc of Texas scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2024

Harvard Maintenance Inc of Texas injury rate improved

Harvard Maintenance Inc of Texas's TCR fell 2.7 from 3.9 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 44% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #140/417
  • PHOTO 53 Clark Street
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~317 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 53 Clark Street (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Harvard Maintenance Inc of Texas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harvard Maintenance Inc of Texas averages 2.0 TCR (44% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harvard Maintenance Inc of Texas TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Harvard Maintenance Inc of Texas falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #140 safest of 417 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Texas.

Harvard Maintenance Inc of Texas (317 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Harvard Maintenance Inc of Texas
Harvard Maintenance Inc of Texas (317 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Harvard Maintenance Inc of Texas has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 1.2 3 0 0
2023 1.2 0.8 3 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 4 0 0
2021 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2020 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2019 2.3 1.9 4 2 0
2018 1.4 0.5 3 0 0
2017 5.3 4.5 13 0 0
2016 3.9 1.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · TX · Houston

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 53 Clark Street 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harvard Maintenance Inc. of Illinois 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central - EVS 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Marion Community - EVS 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE KCK Utility Construction 317 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moss Utilities 317 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockford Corporation 317 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mykawa 317 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Harvard Maintenance Inc. of Illinois 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ong Wr Mustang Sc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 53 Clark Street 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sysco Hampton Roads 317 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hotel Bel-Air 317 FTE
NAT-SIZE Storm Power Components 317 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Corporate 317 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.