Electrical generating and transmission equipment repair and maintenance services · Colorado

Harvest Energy Services

Boulder, CO · ~78 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harvest Energy Services runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electrical generating and transmission equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

Harvest Energy Services: 1.8 TCR = 87% of Electrical generating and transmission equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harvest Energy Services safety composite

Harvest Energy Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Harvest Energy Services held a steady TCR band

Harvest Energy Services's TCR held near 0.1 from 2.2 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Boulder, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.8 · 87% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #18/46
  • PHOTO Rosebud Mining Compa…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rosebud Mining Company- Maintenance Shop (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Harvest Energy Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harvest Energy Services averages 1.8 TCR (87% of the Electrical generating and transmission equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harvest Energy Services TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.3 · BLS 2.1

Where Harvest Energy Services falls in its industry

2,560 Electrical generating and tran establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 46 Electrical generating and tran employers in Colorado.

Harvest Energy Services (78 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Harvest Energy Services
Harvest Energy Services (78 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Harvest Energy Services has more employees than the Electrical generating and transmission e median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.3 0.8 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2016 2.2 2.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · CO · Boulder

2,560 Electrical generating and transmission equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 190 employers in Boulder, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rosebud Mining Company- Maintenance Shop 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Payton Equipment Group 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Pump & Machine 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midwest Valve Services Wausau 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Colorado First Construction dba CFC Construction Inc. 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE RECONSTRUCTION EXPERTS, INC - DENVER 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE JFSNA at Suncor Commerce City 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE EAP Glass 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boulder Campus 1,554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothills Campus 1,368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Measurement Solutions-Boulder Flow 761 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flow Measurement Products 711 FTE
NAT-TCR Volvo Penta 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Toano 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 7993-Procon Millwork Install 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0027 0496 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS) 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Heating and Air Conditioning 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steinberg Mfg. 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mineral Springs 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.