Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric · Arizona

Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS)

Springerville, AZ · ~78 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS) runs at 390% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric workplace, earning a grade F.

Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS): 4.7 TCR = 390% of Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS) safety composite

Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2019

Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS) injury rate improved

Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS)'s TCR fell 2.1 from 4.7 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=8.9 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Springerville, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.7 · 390% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/13
  • PHOTO Lewis Creek Power Pl…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lewis Creek Power Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS) averages 4.7 TCR (390% of the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS) TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=8.9 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=2.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS) falls in its industry

846 Power generation, fossil fuel establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 13 Power generation, fossil fuel employers in Arizona.

Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS) (78 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS)
Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS) (78 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS) has more employees than the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.6 0.0 2 0 0
2018 2.5 1.2 2 0 0
2017 8.9 7.8 8 0 0
2016 4.7 2.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · AZ · Springerville

846 Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 9 employers in Springerville, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lewis Creek Power Plant 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Somerset Operating Company LLC 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ISLAND PARK-NY59 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE GWRC 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sollers Construction, LLC 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Davis And Sons Doors LLC 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Intel Chandler 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest 423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springerville Generating Station 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR White Mountain Regional Medical Center 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY-0017-0017-02076 95 FTE
NAT-TCR Bastian Automation Engineering 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheldon AGP Facility 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tops 680 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Marriott Richmond 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harvest Energy Services 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Heating and Air Conditioning 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mineral Springs 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pavarini North East Construction Company, LLC 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.