Natural gas liquids pipeline transportation · Texas
Harvest Pipeline Company
Houston, TX · ~210 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 0.6
- Avg TCR
- 4.5
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Harvest Pipeline Company runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Natural gas liquids pipeline transportation workplace, earning a grade A.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 0.6
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 4.5
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 4
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Harvest Pipeline Company's OSHA Total Case Rate of 0.6 to the Natural gas liquids pipeline transportation BLS benchmark of 4.5 (14% of benchmark) across 3 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Harvest Pipeline Company's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 4.5 industry benchmark.
Where Harvest Pipeline Company falls in its industry
47 Natural gas liquids pipeline t establishmentsSafer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.6.
Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 17 Natural gas liquids pipeline t employers in Texas.
Trend analysis for Harvest Pipeline Company
Between 2016 and 2018, Harvest Pipeline Company's Total Case Rate improved from 1.1 to 0.3 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 74% decrease across 2 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 0.3, while 2016 saw the highest rate, at 1.1, a spread of 0.8 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 3 reporting years, Harvest Pipeline Company recorded 4 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 3-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 4 injuries shown on this page for Harvest Pipeline Company are sourced from its own 3 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 486910 - Natural gas liquids pipeline transportation.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2018)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 679,130 hours worked = 0.29 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Pipeline Company (this establishment) | 0.64 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 3-year avg |
| Refined petroleum products pipeline transportation industry avg | 4.50 | BLS IIF, NAICS 486910 |
| Texas state avg (all industries) | 3.73 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Harvest Pipeline Company to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2018: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Harvest Pipeline Company's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Natural gas liquids pipeline transportation peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 14% of the Natural gas liquids pipeline transportation benchmark, Harvest Pipeline Company reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Natural gas liquids pipeline transportation sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Harvest Pipeline Company's safety grade?
How many injuries has Harvest Pipeline Company reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Texas, and by nearby establishments in Houston - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~0.6)
Similar size (~210 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.