Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Illinois

Hawthorne Inn of Peru

Peru, IL · ~42 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hawthorne Inn of Peru runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Hawthorne Inn of Peru: 5.9 TCR = 156% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hawthorne Inn of Peru safety composite

Hawthorne Inn of Peru scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.7

2016→2024

Hawthorne Inn of Peru injury rate improved

Hawthorne Inn of Peru's TCR fell 15.7 from 18.5 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 18.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.5 · 2017=7.4 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Peru, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 156% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #96/265
  • PHOTO ACTS Retirement-Life…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Matthews Glen (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Hawthorne Inn of Peru in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hawthorne Inn of Peru averages 5.9 TCR (156% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hawthorne Inn of Peru TCR series: 2016=18.5 · 2017=7.4 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Hawthorne Inn of Peru falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #96 safest of 265 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Illinois.

Hawthorne Inn of Peru (42 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hawthorne Inn of Peru
Hawthorne Inn of Peru (42 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Hawthorne Inn of Peru has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2023 9.6 9.6 3 0 0
2022 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2018 4.4 0.0 2 0 0
2017 7.4 2.5 3 0 0
2016 18.5 2.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IL · Peru

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 59 employers in Peru, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Matthews Glen 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Peaks at Santa Rita 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pilgrim Place In Claremont 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Westminster Village 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE DAS Pontiac, IL 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waterman, IL-R&D 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Springfield IL 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Egyptian Electric Cooperative 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Illinois Valley Community Hospital 634 FTE
CITY-NEAR James Hardie Building Products, Peru IL 384 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 796 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eakas Corporation 353 FTE
NAT-TCR Midway 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Carlie C's IGA #830 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Simmons Farm Raised Catfish 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bellaire, Oh Branch 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE TX/NM - Baytown - 4358 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conklin Warehouse 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greensboro Distribution Center 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Teasdale Latin Foods (Greeley, CO) 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.