General warehousing and storage · North Carolina

Greensboro Distribution Center

Greensboro, NC · ~42 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greensboro Distribution Center runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade C.

Greensboro Distribution Center: 6.3 TCR = 109% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greensboro Distribution Center safety composite

Greensboro Distribution Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2024

Greensboro Distribution Center injury rate improved

Greensboro Distribution Center's TCR fell 0.7 from 5.0 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 15.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=9.9 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=15.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Greensboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 6.3 · 109% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #270/330
  • PHOTO 540-FC001
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 540-FC001 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Greensboro Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greensboro Distribution Center averages 6.3 TCR (109% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greensboro Distribution Center TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=9.9 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=15 · 2022=0 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 5.8

Where Greensboro Distribution Center falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #270 safest of 330 General warehousing and storag employers in North Carolina.

Greensboro Distribution Center (42 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Greensboro Distribution Center
Greensboro Distribution Center (42 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Greensboro Distribution Center has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2023 6.3 6.3 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 15.0 7.5 4 0 0
2020 5.6 2.8 1 1 0
2019 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2018 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2017 9.9 9.9 4 0 0
2016 5.0 2.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NC · Greensboro

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 540-FC001 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dry Creek 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1911-19110006-003048 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Genesis - Bordentown (MRU2442) 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Vernon Hatchery 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPI USA NC LLC - Southport 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALBEMARLE-WMSTN 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin Operations Center 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Vistar Michigan - 1015 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Scott County Road Dept 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TVEPA Main Office 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Wellington Energy, Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Teasdale Latin Foods (Greeley, CO) 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE TX/NM - Baytown - 4358 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hawthorne Inn of Peru 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conklin Warehouse 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.