Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel · Texas

Haydon Corporation TX

Grand Praire, TX · ~43 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Haydon Corporation TX runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade C.

Haydon Corporation TX: 3.2 TCR = 96% of Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Haydon Corporation TX safety composite

Haydon Corporation TX scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2022→2024

Haydon Corporation TX injury rate improved

Haydon Corporation TX's TCR fell 2.2 from 5.8 in 2022 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=5.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · Grand Praire, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 96% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #8/14
  • PHOTO Worthington-Samuel C…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Haydon Corporation TX in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Haydon Corporation TX averages 3.2 TCR (96% of the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Haydon Corporation TX TCR series: 2022=5.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Haydon Corporation TX falls in its industry

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 14 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g employers in Texas.

Haydon Corporation TX (43 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Haydon Corporation TX
Haydon Corporation TX (43 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Haydon Corporation TX has fewer employees than the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, pl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 1.8 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.8 5.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · TX · Grand Praire

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5 employers in Grand Praire, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coilplus Pennsylvania 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Misa Metal Processing Portland, Tennessee 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Universal Stainless - North Jackson 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timpson Hatchery 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midkiff Farmers Coop 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seagraves GP Shelling Plant 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Paso Golden Peanut Treenut Pecan Shelling 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR BSN Sports LLC 512 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Praire-Airgas Safety 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Prairie 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dallas 48 FTE
NAT-TCR Erie Materials Elmira 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 3391 - Costa Mesa 17th St 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Most Inc 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Thermach 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE B87 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oregon Endoscopy Center 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE MiTek USA, Inc. (Tolleson East) 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.