Rolled Steel Shape Manufacturing · Ohio

Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg

Twinsburg, OH · ~44 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Rolled Steel Shape Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg: 3.2 TCR = 96% of Rolled Steel Shape Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg safety composite

Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg: 2.1 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.79× in 2024

Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg's TCR rose 0.4 from 2.1 in 2021 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · Twinsburg, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 96% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #16/36
  • PHOTO Haydon Corporation TX
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Haydon Corporation TX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg averages 3.2 TCR (96% of the Rolled Steel Shape Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg TCR series: 2021=2.1 · 2022=4.9 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg falls in its industry

206 Rolled Steel Shape Manufacturi establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 36 Rolled Steel Shape Manufacturi employers in Ohio.

Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg (44 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg
Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg (44 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Worthington-Samuel Coil Processing Twinsburg has fewer employees than the Rolled Steel Shape Manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 4.9 4.9 2 0 0
2021 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · OH · Twinsburg

206 Rolled Steel Shape Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 152 employers in Twinsburg, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Haydon Corporation TX 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coilplus Pennsylvania 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Misa Metal Processing Portland, Tennessee 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Universal Stainless - North Jackson 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.T.S.S. Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Day Farms - Croton 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Licking Rural Electricfication 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus SE Service Center 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : CLE5 1,079 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CLE5 785 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZECL 598 FTE
CITY-NEAR TWINSBURG OH 475 FTE
NAT-TCR 2002 Coborn's Foley 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 2692 Hornbacher's Express - Fargo, ND 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Weeks Medical Center 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakwood Hills 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westbrook, ME 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kingman Az 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pinnacle Health Hospitalist Services LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ada Ok 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.