Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed · California

Haynes Family of Programs

La Verne, CA · ~280 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Haynes Family of Programs runs at 438% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed workplace, earning a grade F.

Haynes Family of Programs: 16.7 TCR = 438% of Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Haynes Family of Programs safety composite

Haynes Family of Programs scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Haynes Family of Programs: 14.6 → 20.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 23.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.68× in 2024

Haynes Family of Programs's TCR rose 5.5 from 14.6 in 2016 to 20.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 23.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · La Verne, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 16.7 · 438% of ind

  • DART 11.4 DART
  • RANK #162/177
  • PHOTO Southwestern Virgini…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 135 inj
  • SIZE ~280 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southwestern Virginia Mental Health Institute (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Haynes Family of Programs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Haynes Family of Programs averages 16.7 TCR (438% of the Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Haynes Family of Programs TCR series: 2016=14.6 · 2022=23 · 2023=8.9 · 2024=20.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Haynes Family of Programs falls in its industry

1,165 Residential group homes for th establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #162 safest of 177 Residential group homes for th employers in California.

Haynes Family of Programs (280 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Haynes Family of Programs
Haynes Family of Programs (280 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Haynes Family of Programs has more employees than the Residential group homes for the emotiona median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 20.1 11.4 35 2 0
2023 8.9 5.4 16 2 0
2022 23.0 18.9 47 3 0
2016 14.6 9.2 37 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · CA · La Verne

1,165 Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 51 employers in La Verne, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southwestern Virginia Mental Health Institute 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tewksbury Treatment Center/Transitions 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LA-MNTC-LAKESIDE ACADEMY 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Children's Center of Hamden 16.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm Labor Contractor 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE L&G FARMING, INC. 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE Calpine Geysers 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bernards Builders 280 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of La Verne 2,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR F.E. Weymouth Filtration Plant 387 FTE
CITY-NEAR David and Margaret Home, Inc. 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brethren Hillcrest Homes 245 FTE
NAT-TCR Qsp Logistics LLC 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR IMPACTLIFE - Burlington 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Western Buildings 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Safe Air Dowco 16.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spokane Base Horizon 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE 194 - DET Nashville 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE AB May Company 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morgan Auto Group 280 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.