RESIDENTIAL AND OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE FACILITIES. · Minnesota

La-Mntc-Lakeside Academy

Buffalo, MN · ~51 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

La-Mntc-Lakeside Academy runs at 440% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical RESIDENTIAL AND OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE FACILITIES. workplace, earning a grade F.

La-Mntc-Lakeside Academy: 16.7 TCR = 440% of RESIDENTIAL AND OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE FACILITIES. BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

La-Mntc-Lakeside Academy safety composite

La-Mntc-Lakeside Academy scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−24.5

2020→2023

La-Mntc-Lakeside Academy injury rate improved

La-Mntc-Lakeside Academy's TCR fell 24.5 from 34.2 in 2020 to 9.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 34.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=34.2 · 2021=6.4 · 2023=9.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Buffalo, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.7 · 440% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #67/75
  • PHOTO The Children's Cente…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Children's Center of Hamden (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

La-Mntc-Lakeside Academy in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows La-Mntc-Lakeside Academy averages 16.7 TCR (440% of the RESIDENTIAL AND OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE FACILITIES. BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

La-Mntc-Lakeside Academy TCR series: 2020=34.2 · 2021=6.4 · 2023=9.6 · BLS 3.8

Where La-Mntc-Lakeside Academy falls in its industry

1,165 RESIDENTIAL AND OUTPATIENT MEN establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 75 RESIDENTIAL AND OUTPATIENT MEN employers in Minnesota.

La-Mntc-Lakeside Academy (51 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate La-Mntc-Lakeside Academy
La-Mntc-Lakeside Academy (51 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

La-Mntc-Lakeside Academy has fewer employees than the RESIDENTIAL AND OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.6 3.2 3 0 0
2021 6.4 3.2 2 0 0
2020 34.2 30.8 1 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · MN · Buffalo

1,165 RESIDENTIAL AND OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE FACILITIES. employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 74 employers in Buffalo, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Children's Center of Hamden 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tewksbury Treatment Center/Transitions 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southwestern Virginia Mental Health Institute 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Haynes Family of Programs 16.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Union Dairy LLP 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE ON 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wes Hanson Builders 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis Office 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health One Buffalo (Buffalo Hospital) 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health One Buffalo 500 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1577 404 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1577 320 FTE
NAT-TCR Glenco, Inc. 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 240036-Bos-Hyde Park Sta 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Regis Bal Harbour Resort 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bristol Farms Santa Monica 16.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Resolve Marine Group (Projects Division) 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE RK-061-Xenia ( RK-061 ) 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE RK-042-Frankfort ( RK-042 ) 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE RK-040-Benton ( RK-040 ) 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.