Fire alarm system, electric, installation only · North Carolina

Haynes Technologies

Asheville, NC · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Haynes Technologies runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fire alarm system, electric, installation only workplace, earning a grade B.

Haynes Technologies: 1.4 TCR = 50% of Fire alarm system, electric, installation only BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Haynes Technologies safety composite

Haynes Technologies scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Haynes Technologies held a steady TCR band

Haynes Technologies's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Asheville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #36/108
  • PHOTO MP Technologies, LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MP Technologies, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Haynes Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Haynes Technologies averages 1.4 TCR (50% of the Fire alarm system, electric, installation only BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Haynes Technologies TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Haynes Technologies falls in its industry

4,550 Fire alarm system, electric, i establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 108 Fire alarm system, electric, i employers in North Carolina.

Haynes Technologies (31 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Haynes Technologies
Haynes Technologies (31 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Haynes Technologies has fewer employees than the Fire alarm system, electric, installatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 9.6 2.4 2 2 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · NC · Asheville

4,550 Fire alarm system, electric, installation only employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 290 employers in Asheville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MP Technologies, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Best Electrical Co., Inc 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CUPERTINO ELECTRIC, INC. - SAN FRANCISCO OPERATIONS 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Connors Haas Inc. 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Todd Glover Farms Inc 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunny Creek Farm Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rowan 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Hospital; MH Hospital Manager, LLC 8,097 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biltmore Workforce Management 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Medical Associates 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Care Partners 1,018 FTE
NAT-TCR Heath Outdoor Products 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lathrop - BMD 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Harmony Gardens 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Harris Rochester, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brenntag Great Lakes - St. Paul 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE VuCon, LLC 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mutton Rental Center, Inc 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Helpers Care, Inc. dba Mosaic - Rensselaer Falls IRA 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.