Electrical contractors · California

Best Electrical Co., Inc

San Jose, CA · ~24 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Best Electrical Co., Inc runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electrical contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Best Electrical Co., Inc: 1.4 TCR = 50% of Electrical contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Best Electrical Co., Inc safety composite

Best Electrical Co., Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2017→2024

Best Electrical Co., Inc injury rate improved

Best Electrical Co., Inc's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · San Jose, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #120/548
  • PHOTO Haynes Technologies
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Haynes Technologies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Best Electrical Co., Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Best Electrical Co., Inc averages 1.4 TCR (50% of the Electrical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Best Electrical Co., Inc TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Best Electrical Co., Inc falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical contractors establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #120 safest of 548 Electrical contractors employers in California.

Best Electrical Co., Inc (24 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Best Electrical Co., Inc
Best Electrical Co., Inc (24 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Best Electrical Co., Inc has fewer employees than the Electrical contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CA · San Jose

4,550 Electrical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Haynes Technologies 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MP Technologies, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CUPERTINO ELECTRIC, INC. - SAN FRANCISCO OPERATIONS 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Connors Haas Inc. 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agro-Jal Farming Enterprises 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTD Farms 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marc Pura Ranch, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Mercedes TX Millwork 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR US2 Sandy Springs Facility 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Wku Cleaning 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Vacationland Vendors Arcade 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Joseph C. Woodard Printing Company 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marlin Marble 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE PEPRO 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tasman Amarillo, L.P. 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.