Distribution of electric power · North Carolina

Haywood EMC-Combined Districts

Waynesville, NC · ~73 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Haywood EMC-Combined Districts runs at 836% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Haywood EMC-Combined Districts: 10.0 TCR = 836% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Haywood EMC-Combined Districts safety composite

Haywood EMC-Combined Districts scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2019→2022

Haywood EMC-Combined Districts injury rate improved

Haywood EMC-Combined Districts's TCR fell 7.3 from 7.3 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 17.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=7.3 · 2020=17.0 · 2021=15.9 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Waynesville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 836% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #106/107
  • PHOTO CEMC-Springfield
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CEMC-Springfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Haywood EMC-Combined Districts in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Haywood EMC-Combined Districts averages 10.0 TCR (836% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Haywood EMC-Combined Districts TCR series: 2019=7.3 · 2020=17 · 2021=15.9 · 2022=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Haywood EMC-Combined Districts falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #106 safest of 107 Distribution of electric power employers in North Carolina.

Haywood EMC-Combined Districts (73 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Haywood EMC-Combined Districts
Haywood EMC-Combined Districts (73 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Haywood EMC-Combined Districts has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 4 1 0
2021 15.9 13.0 7 4 0
2020 17.0 12.7 7 5 0
2019 7.3 4.4 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · NC · Waynesville

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 45 employers in Waynesville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CEMC-Springfield 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springfield Area Office - 149 Power Company Rd. Springfield 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SANTA CRUZ SERVICE CENTER 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burlington Electric Department 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tri-State Turf of NC 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE REC 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Utilities 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bobbitt Construction, Inc. 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1663 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1663 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Packaging - Waynesville 213 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 023 202 FTE
NAT-TCR Renaud Electric Co Inc 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lackland Surgical Center - EVS 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-EA-BZN-BOZEMAN-BZN-TRML 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wiebe Farms, Inc. 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #674 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trilogy Home Healthcare-Pinellas Park 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seafood City Supermarket - Concord 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE P-R Farms Inc/Palomate Inc 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.