Electric Power Distribution · New York

Hcb Operating Hqtrs(Hcb2)-Ny88

Liverpool, NY · ~207 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hcb Operating Hqtrs(Hcb2)-Ny88 runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

Hcb Operating Hqtrs(Hcb2)-Ny88: 2.7 TCR = 228% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hcb Operating Hqtrs(Hcb2)-Ny88 safety composite

Hcb Operating Hqtrs(Hcb2)-Ny88 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hcb Operating Hqtrs(Hcb2)-Ny88: 1.8 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2023

Hcb Operating Hqtrs(Hcb2)-Ny88's TCR rose 1.1 from 1.8 in 2020 to 2.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Liverpool, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.7 · 228% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #78/110
  • PHOTO Jackson Energy Autho…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~207 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jackson Energy Authority (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Hcb Operating Hqtrs(Hcb2)-Ny88 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hcb Operating Hqtrs(Hcb2)-Ny88 averages 2.7 TCR (228% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hcb Operating Hqtrs(Hcb2)-Ny88 TCR series: 2020=1.8 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=2.9 · BLS 1.2

Where Hcb Operating Hqtrs(Hcb2)-Ny88 falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #78 safest of 110 Electric Power Distribution employers in New York.

Hcb Operating Hqtrs(Hcb2)-Ny88 (207 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hcb Operating Hqtrs(Hcb2)-Ny88
Hcb Operating Hqtrs(Hcb2)-Ny88 (207 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Hcb Operating Hqtrs(Hcb2)-Ny88 has more employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.9 1.4 6 0 0
2022 3.7 2.6 6 1 0
2021 2.6 2.6 5 0 0
2020 1.8 1.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · NY · Liverpool

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 141 employers in Liverpool, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jackson Energy Authority 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Office 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2022 Milan Public Utilities 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - Geraldine 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE M Social Hotel 207 FTE
STATE-SIZE Comfort Systems USA (Syracuse), Inc. - DBA Woodcock & Armani 207 FTE
STATE-SIZE North 207 FTE
STATE-SIZE Contract Pharmacal Corp. 1324 207 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raymour & Flanigan Furniture 6,273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NY Syracuse Electroncs Pkwy (1021) 2,126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Syracuse Campus (1021) 1,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advocates Incorporated 1,030 FTE
NAT-TCR City Club at River Ranch 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health Pharmacuetical Distribution Center 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bay City Mechanical Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation - Elkton 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Airtek Construction 207 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bergstrom Operating Co. dba Thornton and Grooms 207 FTE
NAT-SIZE Landmark of Louisville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 207 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oregon Veterans Home 207 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.