Cooperative hospital laundries (i.e., linen supply services) · New Jersey

HCSC Laundry Asbury Park

Asbury Park, NJ · ~140 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.1
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HCSC Laundry Asbury Park runs at 530% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cooperative hospital laundries (i.e., linen supply services) workplace, earning a grade F.

HCSC Laundry Asbury Park: 11.1 TCR = 530% of Cooperative hospital laundries (i.e., linen supply services) BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HCSC Laundry Asbury Park safety composite

HCSC Laundry Asbury Park scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

HCSC Laundry Asbury Park: 5.4 → 12.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 16.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.95× in 2021

HCSC Laundry Asbury Park's TCR rose 6.8 from 5.4 in 2016 to 12.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 812331 · Asbury Park, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.1 · 530% of ind

  • DART 10.5 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO Oklahoma Food and Be…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 75 inj
  • SIZE ~140 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oklahoma Food and Beverage (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

HCSC Laundry Asbury Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HCSC Laundry Asbury Park averages 11.1 TCR (530% of the Cooperative hospital laundries (i.e., linen supply services) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HCSC Laundry Asbury Park TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2018=16.8 · 2019=11.7 · 2020=9.6 · 2021=12.2 · BLS 2.1

Where HCSC Laundry Asbury Park falls in its industry

334 Cooperative hospital laundries establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Cooperative hospital laundries employers in New Jersey.

HCSC Laundry Asbury Park (140 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate HCSC Laundry Asbury Park
HCSC Laundry Asbury Park (140 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 5.3

HCSC Laundry Asbury Park has more employees than the Cooperative hospital laundries (i.e., li median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 12.2 10.5 15 0 0
2020 9.6 8.9 13 0 0
2019 11.7 9.9 19 0 0
2018 16.8 11.2 21 3 0
2016 5.4 4.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

812331 · NJ · Asbury Park

334 Cooperative hospital laundries (i.e., linen supply services) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 7 employers in Asbury Park, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oklahoma Food and Beverage 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linen Rental Supply, Inc 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bay Towel, Inc. Green Bay 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial Linen Service Inc 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Plant 02 - SH 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orora Visual New Jersey 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robertet Frangrances 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Contract Filling Inc 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCSC Asbury Park Laundry 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR 330255-ASBURY PARK PO 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASBURY PARK_1353444 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Innovative Green Technologies 33 FTE
NAT-TCR BJ Yard / Main Office 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Luther Park at Sandpoint 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastside Machine Co 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Burt Brothers - Farmington 11.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Muncie Power Products - Headquarters 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE SED-2 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interdesign, Inc 3 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lynchburg Container 140 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.