Continuing care retirement communities · New Jersey

Holland Christian Home Association

North Haledon, NJ · ~140 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Holland Christian Home Association runs at 336% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Holland Christian Home Association: 12.8 TCR = 336% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Holland Christian Home Association safety composite

Holland Christian Home Association scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 19% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Holland Christian Home Association injury rate improved

Holland Christian Home Association's TCR fell 1.2 from 10.0 in 2016 to 8.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 33.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.0 · 2017=8.1 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=33.0 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=10.2 · 2023=13.9 · 2024=8.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · North Haledon, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.8 · 336% of ind

  • DART 8.8 DART
  • RANK #75/92
  • PHOTO The Park Oak Grove
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 65 inj
  • SIZE ~140 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Park Oak Grove (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Holland Christian Home Association in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Holland Christian Home Association averages 12.8 TCR (336% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Holland Christian Home Association TCR series: 2016=10 · 2017=8.1 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=33 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=10.2 · 2023=13.9 · 2024=8.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Holland Christian Home Association falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #75 safest of 92 Continuing care retirement com employers in New Jersey.

Holland Christian Home Association (140 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Holland Christian Home Association
Holland Christian Home Association (140 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Holland Christian Home Association has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.8 8.8 7 0 0
2023 13.9 13.9 11 0 0
2022 10.2 10.2 9 0 0
2021 7.3 7.3 8 0 0
2020 33.0 32.1 5 33 1
2019 10.8 6.3 11 1 0
2017 8.1 6.7 5 1 0
2016 10.0 7.8 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NJ · North Haledon

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Park Oak Grove 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Forest Place LLC 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Terrace Citrus Park 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meadowood Corp 12.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Plant 02 - SH 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orora Visual New Jersey 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robertet Frangrances 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Contract Filling Inc 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR the fresh grocer (north haledon) 131 FTE
NAT-TCR The Park Oak Grove 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0427 Houston 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pallet Source, Inc. 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Roseville Fire Department 12.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE EVAL 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bradenton 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omron Management Center of America (OMCA) 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utility Department 140 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.