Elementary and secondary schools · South Carolina

H.E. Bonner Elementary School

Moncks Corner, SC · ~102 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

H.E. Bonner Elementary School runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Elementary and secondary schools workplace, earning a grade F.

H.E. Bonner Elementary School: 2.9 TCR = 204% of Elementary and secondary schools BLS 1.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

H.E. Bonner Elementary School safety composite

H.E. Bonner Elementary School scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2018→2024

H.E. Bonner Elementary School injury rate improved

H.E. Bonner Elementary School's TCR fell 1.6 from 5.6 in 2018 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · Moncks Corner, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.9 · 204% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #36/129
  • PHOTO Lanesboro ISD 229
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lanesboro ISD 229 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

H.E. Bonner Elementary School in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows H.E. Bonner Elementary School averages 2.9 TCR (204% of the Elementary and secondary schools BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

H.E. Bonner Elementary School TCR series: 2018=5.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=4 · BLS 1.4

Where H.E. Bonner Elementary School falls in its industry

3,374 Elementary and secondary schoo establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 129 Elementary and secondary schoo employers in South Carolina.

H.E. Bonner Elementary School (102 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate H.E. Bonner Elementary School
H.E. Bonner Elementary School (102 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

H.E. Bonner Elementary School has more employees than the Elementary and secondary schools median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 2.7 3 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2021 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2020 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.6 3.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · SC · Moncks Corner

3,374 Elementary and secondary schools employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 68 employers in Moncks Corner, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lanesboro ISD 229 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 314 S. Manning 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Gratiot Middle School 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anoka High 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Electric, LLC 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allison-Smith Co. - South Carolina 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pratt (Georgia Box), Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wellford 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berkeley County Government 1,122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moncks Corner Offuce 679 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1146 481 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1146 398 FTE
NAT-TCR Standard Waterproofing 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR UCONN Ward 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Damschroder Roofing, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Worth Transitional Care Center 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Highland Springs Care Center 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Hamburg 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mobile Mark 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morgan & Thornburg, Inc. 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.