Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Georgia

Headquarters

Tucker, GA · ~160 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Headquarters runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade A.

Headquarters: 0.3 TCR = 24% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Headquarters safety composite

Headquarters scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2024

Headquarters injury rate improved

Headquarters's TCR fell 0.7 from 0.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Tucker, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/15
  • PHOTO Midwest Energy Resou…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~160 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Midwest Energy Resources Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Headquarters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Headquarters averages 0.3 TCR (24% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Headquarters TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Headquarters falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 15 Electric power generation, fos employers in Georgia.

Headquarters (160 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Headquarters
Headquarters (160 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Headquarters has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.3 0.7 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · GA · Tucker

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 132 employers in Tucker, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Midwest Energy Resources Company 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSN-Sanford Plant 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Batesville Generating Station 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calpine Houston Corporate Offices 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Anning-Johnson Company Georgia 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benning DPW 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE DYMA Brands (Formally Diamond Crystal Brands) Bremen 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Specialty Fabrics & Converting 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emory Ortho and Spine Hospital 1,402 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emory Ortho and Spine Hospital - EHC 1,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR Williams Plant Services, LLC (All Locations) 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR GA.TUCKE.9 - Ricoh Usa, Inc 445 FTE
NAT-TCR Precision Strip, Inc. Headquarters 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bridgewater Facility 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CRM Liberty SC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Braskem Neal Facility 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atec 1 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Freightliner Northwest, Pacific WA 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dawn Food Products - Jackson Manufacturing 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Home Care 160 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.