Parks and recreation commission, government · North Carolina

Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation

Chapel Hill, NC · ~213 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation runs at 263% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Parks and recreation commission, government workplace, earning a grade F.

Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation: 8.4 TCR = 263% of Parks and recreation commission, government BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation safety composite

Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.4

2016→2018

Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation injury rate improved

Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation's TCR fell 8.4 from 12.1 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.1 · 2017=9.4 · 2018=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Chapel Hill, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 263% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #12/16
  • PHOTO City of Knoxville Pa…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~213 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Knoxville Parks & Recreation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation averages 8.4 TCR (263% of the Parks and recreation commission, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation TCR series: 2016=12.1 · 2017=9.4 · 2018=3.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation falls in its industry

413 Parks and recreation commissio establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 16 Parks and recreation commissio employers in North Carolina.

Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation (213 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation
Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation (213 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation has more employees than the Parks and recreation commission, governm median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.7 2.1 5 2 0
2017 9.4 9.4 7 1 0
2016 12.1 8.5 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · NC · Chapel Hill

413 Parks and recreation commission, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 104 employers in Chapel Hill, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Knoxville Parks & Recreation 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific Region Construction 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hansen Dam Aquatic Center 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recreation & Parks 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Recore Electrical Contractors, Inc. 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frontier Spinning Mills Plant 1 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Packaging - Waynesville 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Greensboro PHC 213 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 21,973 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Health Care 11,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spec Personnel, LLC 644 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brookdale chapel hill 509 FTE
NAT-TCR Horizon Equipment LLC 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cone Distributing - Tallahassee 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun-Tek Pet LLC 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sioux Falls (Sdsio) 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Columbus McKinnon Corporation Hoist Division 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lansing CCA 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Heritage Center 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Care Centers of Aurora 213 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.