Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Texas

Heart Hospital of Austin

Austin, TX · ~400 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heart Hospital of Austin runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade C.

Heart Hospital of Austin: 6.6 TCR = 88% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heart Hospital of Austin safety composite

Heart Hospital of Austin scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2023

Heart Hospital of Austin injury rate improved

Heart Hospital of Austin's TCR fell 0.6 from 5.2 in 2016 to 4.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.2 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=6.5 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.6 · 88% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #412/520
  • PHOTO North Shore Medical …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 142 inj
  • SIZE ~400 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: North Shore Medical Center Salem (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Heart Hospital of Austin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heart Hospital of Austin averages 6.6 TCR (88% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heart Hospital of Austin TCR series: 2016=5.2 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=6.5 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=4.6 · BLS 7.5

Where Heart Hospital of Austin falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #412 safest of 520 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Texas.

Heart Hospital of Austin (400 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Heart Hospital of Austin
Heart Hospital of Austin (400 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Heart Hospital of Austin has fewer employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.6 1.9 16 1 0
2022 8.1 1.4 27 1 0
2021 7.8 3.3 24 0 0
2019 6.5 5.1 19 0 0
2018 6.1 2.4 18 0 0
2017 7.9 4.1 23 0 0
2016 5.2 2.8 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · TX · Austin

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR North Shore Medical Center Salem 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4701-674 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1855-WIMIL8 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillcrest Hospital 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE R Construction Company 400 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mason Construction, LLC. 400 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lochridge-Priest, Inc. - Waco 400 FTE
STATE-SIZE BrandSafway LLC - Dow Chemicals - Freeport 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Calloway & Associates 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Broadway St. Chicago IL Store 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Plains Electric Cooperative 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Niagara - Rialto Ca 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE South Milwaukee Wi 400 FTE
NAT-SIZE KEEN, Inc. 400 FTE
NAT-SIZE Redlands - Bld: 0687 - 15 400 FTE
NAT-SIZE Auburn Teleservice Center 400 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.