Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Maryland

Heartfields at Frederick

Frederick, MD · ~50 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heartfields at Frederick runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Heartfields at Frederick: 3.2 TCR = 85% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heartfields at Frederick safety composite

Heartfields at Frederick scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2017→2024

Heartfields at Frederick injury rate improved

Heartfields at Frederick's TCR fell 2.8 from 5.4 in 2017 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.4 · 2018=2.6 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Frederick, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 85% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #12/79
  • PHOTO Heritage-9, LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage-9, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Heartfields at Frederick in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heartfields at Frederick averages 3.2 TCR (85% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heartfields at Frederick TCR series: 2017=5.4 · 2018=2.6 · 2022=3 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Heartfields at Frederick falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 79 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Maryland.

Heartfields at Frederick (50 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Heartfields at Frederick
Heartfields at Frederick (50 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Heartfields at Frederick has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2017 5.4 5.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MD · Frederick

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 267 employers in Frederick, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage-9, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Country Time Inn 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avita of Wells 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prestonwood Court Assisted Living 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Green Leaf Extracts LLC dba gLeaf 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bell Nursery - Burtonsville 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE MS - Annapolis Junction, MD - 1AJMD 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company TPM 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR MD-03 4,250 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing Center 775 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing 711 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific Frederick, MD (BID - Executive Way) 568 FTE
NAT-TCR Sparton Technology Corp 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cougar Contracting LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR JAAM Electric 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR RJK Transportation Inc 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Del Monte Meat Company 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Automation Guarding Systems 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glenshaw 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atg - Chan 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.