Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Country Time Inn

Kings Mountain, NC · ~44 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Country Time Inn runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Country Time Inn: 3.2 TCR = 85% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Country Time Inn safety composite

Country Time Inn scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2024

Country Time Inn injury rate improved

Country Time Inn's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2017=15.6 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Kings Mountain, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #69/356
  • PHOTO Heritage-9, LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage-9, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Country Time Inn in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Country Time Inn averages 3.2 TCR (85% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Country Time Inn TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=15.6 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Country Time Inn falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Country Time Inn (44 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Country Time Inn
Country Time Inn (44 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Country Time Inn has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2018 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 15.6 7.8 6 0 0
2016 2.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Kings Mountain

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 64 employers in Kings Mountain, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage-9, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartfields at Frederick 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avita of Wells 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prestonwood Court Assisted Living 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sleepy Creek Farms 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALBEMARLE WMSTN 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morganton 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aqua Services, Inc. - Cary 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanesbrands, Inc. Cleveland Distribution Center 515 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6903_15950 397 FTE
CITY-NEAR KINGS MOUNTAIN NC 370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanesbrands, Inc. Canterbury Distribution Center 368 FTE
NAT-TCR Stenstrom Petroleum Services Group 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Raymondville 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage-9, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tolomatic, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Llano Masonry LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8400-DRC-WOODSTOCK 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE 36L7-EAN Holdings, LLC Hawaii Division 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smyth Companies - Green Bay 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.