Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Ohio

Hearth and Home at Harding

Springfield, OH · ~23 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hearth and Home at Harding runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Hearth and Home at Harding: 3.5 TCR = 91% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hearth and Home at Harding safety composite

Hearth and Home at Harding scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hearth and Home at Harding: 0.0 → 7.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.05× in 2024

Hearth and Home at Harding's TCR rose 7.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 7.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Springfield, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 91% of ind

  • DART 7.1 DART
  • RANK #71/234
  • PHOTO Progressive Care Maj…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Progressive Care Majestic Pines (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Hearth and Home at Harding in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hearth and Home at Harding averages 3.5 TCR (91% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hearth and Home at Harding TCR series: 2016=0 · 2021=6.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=7.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Hearth and Home at Harding falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 234 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

Hearth and Home at Harding (23 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hearth and Home at Harding
Hearth and Home at Harding (23 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Hearth and Home at Harding has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.1 7.1 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OH · Springfield

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 186 employers in Springfield, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Progressive Care Majestic Pines 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tabor Hills Healthcare 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR McKnight Place Assisted Living and Memory Care 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auberge at Onion Creek 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE MID EAST PRODUCTION LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schlessman Seed Co 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake County Nursery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE LCN Holdings Inc dba Lake County Nursery 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Navistar Springfield Assembly Plant 1,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Springfield Regional Medical Center 1,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springfield Regional Medical Center 1,512 FTE
CITY-NEAR VA Springfield 843 FTE
NAT-TCR Ki Mobility - Headquarters (Stevens Point, WI) 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Westby 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Jamestown Container Rochester, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Morey Industries, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Location 24 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premium Manufacturing Inc dba Evans Manufacturing 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Clerk's Office 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Propak - Oklahoma City, OK RLC 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.