Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Heartis San Antonio

San Antonio, TX · ~42 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heartis San Antonio runs at 346% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Heartis San Antonio: 13.1 TCR = 346% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heartis San Antonio safety composite

Heartis San Antonio scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Heartis San Antonio: 0.0 → 21.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 24.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.6× in 2022

Heartis San Antonio's TCR rose 21.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 21.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 24.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.1 · 346% of ind

  • DART 21.0 DART
  • RANK #415/470
  • PHOTO Danby House
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Danby House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Heartis San Antonio in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heartis San Antonio averages 13.1 TCR (346% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heartis San Antonio TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=16.3 · 2020=23 · 2021=24.4 · 2022=21 · BLS 3.8

Where Heartis San Antonio falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #415 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Heartis San Antonio (42 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Heartis San Antonio
Heartis San Antonio (42 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Heartis San Antonio has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 21.0 21.0 2 8 0
2021 24.4 22.0 1 9 0
2020 23.0 18.4 10 0 0
2019 16.3 4.6 7 0 0
2018 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2017 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · San Antonio

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Danby House 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gardens of Statesville 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerald Valley 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bartlett Woods Inc. 13.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Headquarters Southeast 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Littlefield Feedyard 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE TEXAS BEEF PRODUCERS 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3-H Dairy LLC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-01294 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Magnolia Creek Skilled Nursing and Therapy 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Perry SNF Operator LLC 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sharpe Fabrication Inc 13.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eternal Springs of Gilbert 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silver Creek Senior Living 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blossom Grove Alzheimer's Special Care Center 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enterprise Service Center - 10FA 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.