Computer systems integration analysis and design services · Wisconsin

Heartland Business Systems LC

Little Chute, WI · ~280 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heartland Business Systems LC runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Computer systems integration analysis and design services workplace, earning a grade C.

Heartland Business Systems LC: 0.5 TCR = 94% of Computer systems integration analysis and design services BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heartland Business Systems LC safety composite

Heartland Business Systems LC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Heartland Business Systems LC held a steady TCR band

Heartland Business Systems LC's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · Little Chute, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.5 · 94% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Markem-Imaje - Systech
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~280 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Markem-Imaje - Systech (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Heartland Business Systems LC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heartland Business Systems LC averages 0.5 TCR (94% of the Computer systems integration analysis and design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heartland Business Systems LC TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.3 · BLS 0.5

Where Heartland Business Systems LC falls in its industry

181 Computer systems integration a establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Computer systems integration a employers in Wisconsin.

Heartland Business Systems LC (280 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Heartland Business Systems LC
Heartland Business Systems LC (280 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Heartland Business Systems LC has fewer employees than the Computer systems integration analysis an median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.8 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · WI · Little Chute

181 Computer systems integration analysis and design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 29 employers in Little Chute, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Markem-Imaje - Systech 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lenexa Facility 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hill-Rom Health Information Technology Solutions 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR FEi.com Inc 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Infinity 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE De Pere Cabinet, Inc. 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE Transcontinental Packaging Menasha 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE MasterMold LLC Johnson Creek 280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle Pizza Co. - Little Chute 812 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trilliant Food & Nutrition 436 FTE
CITY-NEAR Building Services Group 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heartland Business Systems - LC 235 FTE
NAT-TCR Earlens Corporation 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dickinson Agronomy / Energy 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hitachi Astemo Findlay, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR STLSMO01 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Miami Fl (Medley) 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE International automotive components 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Pacific Resorts, Inc. 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sweco 280 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.