CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services · Wisconsin

Heartland Business Systems - PW

Pewaukee, WI · ~54 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heartland Business Systems - PW runs at 356% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services workplace, earning a grade F.

Heartland Business Systems - PW: 1.8 TCR = 356% of CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heartland Business Systems - PW safety composite

Heartland Business Systems - PW scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Heartland Business Systems - PW: 0.0 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 3.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2017

Heartland Business Systems - PW's TCR rose 3.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · Pewaukee, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.8 · 356% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Ocado Solutions USA …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ocado Solutions USA Groveland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Heartland Business Systems - PW in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heartland Business Systems - PW averages 1.8 TCR (356% of the CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heartland Business Systems - PW TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.6 · BLS 0.5

Where Heartland Business Systems - PW falls in its industry

181 CAE (computer-aided engineerin establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 CAE (computer-aided engineerin employers in Wisconsin.

Heartland Business Systems - PW (54 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Heartland Business Systems - PW
Heartland Business Systems - PW (54 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Heartland Business Systems - PW has fewer employees than the CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.6 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · WI · Pewaukee

181 CAE (computer-aided engineering) systems integration design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 95 employers in Pewaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ocado Solutions USA Groveland 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Santa Rosa Information Technology 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Automation Group LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cart.com - Terrell 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dairy Dreams LLC 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE A&M Dittrich 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Utility Services, Inc- WI- Brownsville 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Payne & Dolan, Inc - Racine/Kensoha 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR CORPORATE 610 FTE
CITY-NEAR PEWAUKEE WI 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SWI1 389 FTE
CITY-NEAR TOTAL MECHANICAL, Inc 268 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlantic Nurseries, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 0075 - Wichita, Ks 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryerson- Columbus 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greece Ambulance 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE CORE Construction Services of Illinois, Inc. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Sweet Springs Inc 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of California West LLC 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.