Rolling mill machinery and equipment, metalworking, manufacturing · Florida

Heartland Metals, Inc.

Lake Placid, FL · ~48 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heartland Metals, Inc. runs at 351% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Rolling mill machinery and equipment, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Heartland Metals, Inc.: 11.6 TCR = 351% of Rolling mill machinery and equipment, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heartland Metals, Inc. safety composite

Heartland Metals, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.0

2016→2024

Heartland Metals, Inc. injury rate improved

Heartland Metals, Inc.'s TCR fell 11.0 from 13.1 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 38.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.1 · 2017=13.8 · 2018=16.6 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=38.1 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333519 · Lake Placid, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 351% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK P2
  • PHOTO SRS Crisafulli, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SRS Crisafulli, Inc. (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Heartland Metals, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heartland Metals, Inc. averages 11.6 TCR (351% of the Rolling mill machinery and equipment, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heartland Metals, Inc. TCR series: 2016=13.1 · 2017=13.8 · 2018=16.6 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=38.1 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Heartland Metals, Inc. falls in its industry

114 Rolling mill machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Heartland Metals, Inc. (48 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Heartland Metals, Inc.
Heartland Metals, Inc. (48 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Heartland Metals, Inc. has fewer employees than the Rolling mill machinery and equipment, me median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 9.4 5.7 5 0 0
2020 38.1 30.1 18 1 0
2019 8.8 8.8 4 0 0
2018 16.6 14.5 8 0 0
2017 13.8 11.9 7 0 0
2016 13.1 13.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333519 · FL · Lake Placid

114 Rolling mill machinery and equipment, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 21 employers in Lake Placid, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SRS Crisafulli, Inc. 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GRANUTECH-SATURN SYSTEMS 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SoBrite Technologies 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dalton Industries 13.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE MNE Northest Service Center Strm 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miami Dispatch & Planning 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Concrete Specialist 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Galloway Roofing 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake Placid Health and Rehabilitation Center 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Lake Placid 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 1547 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Lake Placid 136 FTE
NAT-TCR T&L Specialty Co 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at Charlottesville 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LSB - Halsted St 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Crawfordsville LLC 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Polymer Science 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wise Correctional Unit #18 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE MJM Masonry Inc 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mission Linen Supply Bend 4200 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.