Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing · Indiana

Polymer Science

Monticello, IN · ~48 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Polymer Science runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Polymer Science: 2.5 TCR = 77% of Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Polymer Science safety composite

Polymer Science scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2024

Polymer Science injury rate improved

Polymer Science's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=9.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325510 · Monticello, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/21
  • PHOTO RJR Technologies Cal…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RJR Technologies California (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Polymer Science in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Polymer Science averages 2.5 TCR (77% of the Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Polymer Science TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=9.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Polymer Science falls in its industry

530 Industrial product finishes an establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 21 Industrial product finishes an employers in Indiana.

Polymer Science (48 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Polymer Science
Polymer Science (48 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Polymer Science has fewer employees than the Industrial product finishes and coatings median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 9.4 6.3 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2018 4.3 2.2 2 0 0
2017 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.2 2.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325510 · IN · Monticello

530 Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 25 employers in Monticello, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RJR Technologies California 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ultra Optics 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PICCO Coatings Company Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dur-A-Flex 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Police Department 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pure Green Farms 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International Rushville 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harrison County REMC 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR JMC Monticello IN 368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana Beach LLC 324 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2771 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regal Power Transmission Solutions 244 FTE
NAT-TCR h&m USA Dies 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at University of Buffalo 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR LaGrou DesPlaines 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR GLOCK Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heartland Metals, Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mission Linen Supply Bend 4200 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foster Brothers Wood Products, Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Operations Center 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.