Locating underground utility lines prior to digging · North Carolina

Heath Consultants Incorporated--Charlotte

Charlotte, NC · ~424 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heath Consultants Incorporated--Charlotte runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Locating underground utility lines prior to digging workplace, earning a grade C.

Heath Consultants Incorporated--Charlotte: 2.6 TCR = 101% of Locating underground utility lines prior to digging BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heath Consultants Incorporated--Charlotte safety composite

Heath Consultants Incorporated--Charlotte scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Heath Consultants Incorporated--Charlotte held a steady TCR band

Heath Consultants Incorporated--Charlotte's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.8 in 2020 to 2.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.8 · 2021=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561990 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 101% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO East Missouri (EMO) …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~424 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: East Missouri (EMO) 3501 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Heath Consultants Incorporated--Charlotte in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heath Consultants Incorporated--Charlotte averages 2.6 TCR (101% of the Locating underground utility lines prior to digging BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heath Consultants Incorporated--Charlotte TCR series: 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.5 · BLS 2.6

Where Heath Consultants Incorporated--Charlotte falls in its industry

208 Locating underground utility l establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Locating underground utility l employers in North Carolina.

Heath Consultants Incorporated--Charlotte (424 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Heath Consultants Incorporated--Charlotte
Heath Consultants Incorporated--Charlotte (424 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Heath Consultants Incorporated--Charlotte has more employees than the Locating underground utility lines prior median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.5 2.2 10 0 0
2020 2.8 2.0 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561990 · NC · Charlotte

208 Locating underground utility lines prior to digging employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR East Missouri (EMO) 3501 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minnesota (MIN) 3301 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Specialty Underwater Services 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Web Industries Atlanta 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE BE Aerospace Inc (WinstonSalem NC Fairchild 424 FTE
STATE-SIZE Field Sales South East 424 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2134 424 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stokes County Government 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Rehrig Pacific Company Kansas 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rehrig Pacific Company Erie 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lile Relocation Services - Corporate Office 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health Aero Med DC 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kirby Offshore Marine-East 424 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courage Center 424 FTE
NAT-SIZE ATL - Flight Ops 424 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairfax County Water Authority 424 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.