Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Oklahoma

Helicomb International Inc.

Tulsa, OK · ~75 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Helicomb International Inc. runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Helicomb International Inc.: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Helicomb International Inc. safety composite

Helicomb International Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2022

Helicomb International Inc. injury rate improved

Helicomb International Inc.'s TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Tulsa, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/31
  • PHOTO Aerospace : Irvine FSD
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aerospace : Irvine FSD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Helicomb International Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Helicomb International Inc. averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Helicomb International Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Helicomb International Inc. falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 31 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Oklahoma.

Helicomb International Inc. (75 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Helicomb International Inc.
Helicomb International Inc. (75 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Helicomb International Inc. has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.1 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · OK · Tulsa

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aerospace : Irvine FSD 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hexcel Kent 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosen Aviation 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primus International Auburn 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chickasha Field Office 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE AES Shady Point 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE COPPERHEAD PIPELINE AND CONSTRUCTION INC 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE US167: Tulsa 441 - SG 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Lake Highland Preparatory Sch. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MMS Event Planning 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR First State Bank 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Concordia University-Wisconsin 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Silos Baking Co 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE 502 El Super Fresh 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gamma North 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Old Bridge Township Bd of Ed 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.