Box lunches (for sale off premises) manufacturing · California

HelloFresh CA (Distribution Center)

Richmond, CA · ~247 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.2
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HelloFresh CA (Distribution Center) runs at 445% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Box lunches (for sale off premises) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

HelloFresh CA (Distribution Center): 18.2 TCR = 445% of Box lunches (for sale off premises) manufacturing BLS 4.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HelloFresh CA (Distribution Center) safety composite

HelloFresh CA (Distribution Center) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

HelloFresh CA (Distribution Center): 9.0 → 30.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 30.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.21× in 2019

HelloFresh CA (Distribution Center)'s TCR rose 21.4 from 9.0 in 2017 to 30.4 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311991 · Richmond, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 18.2 · 445% of ind

  • DART 22.1 DART
  • RANK #65/69
  • PHOTO Grinnell Kitchen
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 90 inj
  • SIZE ~247 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grinnell Kitchen (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

HelloFresh CA (Distribution Center) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HelloFresh CA (Distribution Center) averages 18.2 TCR (445% of the Box lunches (for sale off premises) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HelloFresh CA (Distribution Center) TCR series: 2017=9 · 2018=15.3 · 2019=30.4 · BLS 4.1

Where HelloFresh CA (Distribution Center) falls in its industry

376 Box lunches (for sale off prem establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 69 Box lunches (for sale off prem employers in California.

HelloFresh CA (Distribution Center) (247 employees, TCR 18.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate HelloFresh CA (Distribution Center)
HelloFresh CA (Distribution Center) (247 employees, TCR 18.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1

HelloFresh CA (Distribution Center) has more employees than the Box lunches (for sale off premises) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 30.4 22.1 50 1 0
2018 15.3 13.6 27 0 0
2017 9.0 9.0 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311991 · CA · Richmond

376 Box lunches (for sale off premises) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Richmond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grinnell Kitchen 18.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fresh N Lean - CA 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Support Center 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pershing 17.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lodi Plant 247 FTE
STATE-SIZE D&D Gear dba Absolute Technologies, Inc. 247 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lakin Tire West - SFS 247 FTE
STATE-SIZE 125 TUSTIN CA 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 134 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 635 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 147 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 105 2,724 FTE
NAT-TCR Trailmaster 18.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Arc Allegany-Steuben-East Main 18.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Paul House and Healthcare Center 18.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amalgamate Processing, Inc - Fort Worth 18.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Standard, East Village 247 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manitou Group Madison SD 247 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sterling Lumber Company, LLC. 247 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1901 Mechanical and Plumbing 247 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.