Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Texas

Hendrick Medical Center South

Abilene, TX · ~777 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hendrick Medical Center South runs at 260% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade F.

Hendrick Medical Center South: 11.7 TCR = 260% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hendrick Medical Center South safety composite

Hendrick Medical Center South scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−21.1

2020→2024

Hendrick Medical Center South injury rate improved

Hendrick Medical Center South's TCR fell 21.1 from 27.8 in 2020 to 6.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 27.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=27.8 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=8.4 · 2023=10.2 · 2024=6.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Abilene, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.7 · 260% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #408/417
  • PHOTO PSSI - 0690 Holmes F…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 158 inj
  • SIZE ~777 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PSSI - 0690 Holmes Foods Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Hendrick Medical Center South in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hendrick Medical Center South averages 11.7 TCR (260% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hendrick Medical Center South TCR series: 2020=27.8 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=8.4 · 2023=10.2 · 2024=6.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Hendrick Medical Center South falls in its industry

4,064 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #408 safest of 417 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Texas.

Hendrick Medical Center South (777 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hendrick Medical Center South
Hendrick Medical Center South (777 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Hendrick Medical Center South has more employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.7 0.9 28 3 0
2023 10.2 1.3 38 9 0
2022 8.4 2.3 36 4 0
2021 5.6 1.1 29 1 0
2020 27.8 10.3 27 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · TX · Abilene

4,064 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 238 employers in Abilene, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PSSI - 0690 Holmes Foods Inc. 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR King Janitorial Equipment Services 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR BBB 15030 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE WhiteWater Express Car Wash 777 FTE
STATE-SIZE EDP Renewables North America LLC 776 FTE
STATE-SIZE DNT Construction LLC 776 FTE
STATE-SIZE TXMYK - MYKAWA 778 FTE
CITY-NEAR HENDRICK MEDICAL CENTER 3,025 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lauren Engineers & Constructors, Inc. 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR Abilene CCD 573 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hendrick Health Service Center 456 FTE
NAT-TCR 1501 Dothan AL Gateway Tire South East Inc LLC 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Gristedes #437 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Romeoville - CPL 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 0190 - South Gate 11.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 8027655 Nike 777 FTE
NAT-SIZE LAZ Parking Mid Atlantic, LLC 777 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terex Washington Moses Lake 777 FTE
NAT-SIZE 193-DC001 777 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.