Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Georgia

Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Ellijay

Ellijay, GA · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Ellijay runs at 320% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Ellijay: 8.9 TCR = 320% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Ellijay safety composite

Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Ellijay scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Ellijay: 4.3 → 13.6 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 13.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.52× in 2017

Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Ellijay's TCR rose 9.4 from 4.3 in 2016 to 13.6 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Ellijay, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.9 · 320% of ind

  • DART 13.6 DART
  • RANK #70/71
  • PHOTO NA-US-CA-Victorville…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NA-US-CA-Victorville-Phantom West (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Ellijay in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Ellijay averages 8.9 TCR (320% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Ellijay TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=13.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Ellijay falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 71 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Georgia.

Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Ellijay (23 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Ellijay
Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Ellijay (23 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Henkels & McCoy, Georgia - Ellijay has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 13.6 13.6 3 0 0
2016 4.3 4.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · GA · Ellijay

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 23 employers in Ellijay, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NA-US-CA-Victorville-Phantom West 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PAU:PA031 - PA031-Pauley Constr-Longmont, 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-NV-Reno-Capital Blvd 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GCI:GCCON - GCCON-Concord, NC 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Canon Pullet 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clermont Hatchery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hatchery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROSSMAN APIARIES LLC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pilgrim's Pride Processing Plant 829 FTE
CITY-NEAR HMS 199 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ellijay Telephone 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whitepath Fab Tech 156 FTE
NAT-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Monterey 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pig 'N Pancake - Seaside 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Goldstein & Burton dba Nu Products Seasoning Co. 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR #637 Belmar Shoprite 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tishler Industries Incorporated 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE TPC 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0614 - Yuba City, Ca 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0533 - Yakima, Wa 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.