Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) · Texas

Herzog Technologies Inc

Fort Worth, TX · ~211 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Herzog Technologies Inc runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) workplace, earning a grade A.

Herzog Technologies Inc: 0.7 TCR = 24% of Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Herzog Technologies Inc safety composite

Herzog Technologies Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Herzog Technologies Inc held a steady TCR band

Herzog Technologies Inc's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.5 in 2020 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #62/114
  • PHOTO 105468 - GPA-OT Whar…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~211 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 105468 - GPA-OT Wharf Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Herzog Technologies Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Herzog Technologies Inc averages 0.7 TCR (24% of the Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Herzog Technologies Inc TCR series: 2020=0.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Herzog Technologies Inc falls in its industry

932 Railway construction (e.g., in establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 114 Railway construction (e.g., in employers in Texas.

Herzog Technologies Inc (211 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Herzog Technologies Inc
Herzog Technologies Inc (211 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Herzog Technologies Inc has more employees than the Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2023 1.2 1.2 4 0 0
2022 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.5 0.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · TX · Fort Worth

932 Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 105468 - GPA-OT Wharf Construction 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turner at ExxonMobil Plastics & Resins Baton Rouge LA 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Honeywell Mobile 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harbour Contractors, Inc. 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Structure Tone Southwest 211 FTE
STATE-SIZE PICCo - 6300239 P66 Sweeny 211 FTE
STATE-SIZE Standard Constructors, Inc. 211 FTE
STATE-SIZE Custom Air Products and Services Inc. 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Waterloo West 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR HMNBM04 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Chemours Company FC, LLC - Johnsonville 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Belmont Admin 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE La Tortilleria 211 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mestek, Inc., Sterling Heating Division 211 FTE
NAT-SIZE Freeman Neosho Hospital 211 FTE
NAT-SIZE OP 211 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.