Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · California

Hesler Logistics Inc

San Diego, CA · ~35 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hesler Logistics Inc runs at 154% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Hesler Logistics Inc: 10.0 TCR = 154% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hesler Logistics Inc safety composite

Hesler Logistics Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2020→2021

Hesler Logistics Inc injury rate improved

Hesler Logistics Inc's TCR fell 0.8 from 10.4 in 2020 to 9.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=10.4 · 2021=9.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.0 · 154% of ind

  • DART 9.6 DART
  • RANK #346/710
  • PHOTO MXG
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MXG (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hesler Logistics Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hesler Logistics Inc averages 10.0 TCR (154% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hesler Logistics Inc TCR series: 2020=10.4 · 2021=9.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Hesler Logistics Inc falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #346 safest of 710 Express delivery services (exc employers in California.

Hesler Logistics Inc (35 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Hesler Logistics Inc
Hesler Logistics Inc (35 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Hesler Logistics Inc has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.6 9.6 4 0 0
2020 10.4 6.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CA · San Diego

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MXG 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 6322 ATLANTIS DRIVE 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TUSCALOOSA (ALTUS) 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR POUGHKEEPSIE (NYPOU) 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION FABRICATION/CARPENTRY/PAINTING/ELECTRIC/PIPE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meek Ranches LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfsen Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR CM Ams 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR County Line Rd. 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR East Green Bay WI FXFE-EGB 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rio Grande Inn 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Premium Waters - Pittsfield 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northeast Service Center 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sedano's Supermarket #15 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri-State Wholesale Flooring, Inc. 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.